What makes you finally confident in your conclusion? Did you de-emphasize, bolster, trade off, or collapse the other options?
Assignment: Research a problem and propose a solution, assessing the credibility of sources and accurately documenting all sources.
Write a minimum 1,600 word MLA-style paper addressing multiple sides of the issue. Include a one-sentence underlined thesis statement that is your conclusion after careful analysis of the issue. You will be graded for content,organization of ideas, understanding of critical thinking components, writing style, and proper use of MLA style .
Read, analyze, identify, and evaluate the argument using components from our class and textbook, and come to a final conclusion on the issue.
Use your sources to support your position. Include the following categories: (these can serve as your SUBTOPICS if you wish):
A) Chapter 7: Identify arguments FOR AND AGAINST your position on the issue and evaluate at least ONE of your arguments based on the FOUR TESTS.
B) Chapter 7 and Chapter 8: Identify logical fallacies OF THE SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT YOU OPPOSE and identify which kind of logical fallacy they are.
C) Chapter 4: Identify vagueness and ambiguity of claims on either side of the argument
D) Consider/address the ethics and how ethics relates to the controversy (Chapter 16)
E) Finally, identify how you have used the FOUR PHASES (226-228) of decision making to make your final decision. This is a brief summary of the Four Phases, though the book goes into much greater details:
1) What were some the possible conclusions on the issue?
2) Which choice was the most attractive or stood out?
3) In compared to the other possible conclusions, why is your option better than the others ?
4) What makes you finally confident in your conclusion? Did you de-emphasize, bolster, trade off, or collapse the other options?
Criteria
Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, Vocabulary, Sentence Structure and so forth 20%
Evaluate a generalization,, Identify vagueness and ambiguity of claims, Evaluate the Credibility of Claims and Sources, Identify Fallacies, and Consider Ethics 40%
The paper is well organized and easy to read 5%